Everyone who has studied history at school or simplywas born in the 60s. of the last century, knows that some historians refer to the Brezhnev era in a special way. They believe that this was a "stagnation" - a period that is characterized by the canning of the old communist regime. However, some historians disagree with this term.
Consider the polar points of view on this issue in more detail.
It is generally accepted that this stage in the developmentSoviet state began with the advent of the new Secretary General. His name was Brezhnev Leonid Ilyich. He appeared on this post unexpectedly, because of the voluntary and compulsory retirement of the "reformer" NS. Khrushchev in the early 60's. last century.
The reign of Brezhnev lasted 18 years. In general, it was an attempt to preserve the achievements of the USSR, which the country achieved under Stalin.
Unlike the formidable Stalin, Leonid Ilichdiffered in the softness of character and the lack of desire for unusual social transformations. During his reign, the purges of the party apparatus ceased, which allowed officials to work in their posts without fear of being fired. Ordinary Soviet citizens were much less afraid of power, often discussed the problems of socialist society in family conversations in their kitchens, and waited for change.
The underground market began to develop due to the shortage of food and consumer goods, which contributed to the emergence of black schemes of resale of goods.
As a whole, stagnation is a special period in the history of the USSR.On the one hand, this era was characterized by stability and tranquility in social terms. On the other hand, Soviet people, closed by the Iron Curtain, increasingly reflected that the capitalist world also has its advantages, and dreamed of leaving abroad. A special myth was created that the Western man as a whole lives much better and more comfortable than a citizen of the USSR.
The period of stagnation in the USSR was characterized by many features that were unique to this time:
1. Stable development of spheres of culture, art, education, science, mass construction.
It was in the Brezhnev era that many people couldget long-awaited individual apartments. Active construction of new microdistricts, simultaneously with which kindergartens, polyclinics, schools, palaces of children's creativity were put in operation.
The system of education was developing, universities were opened.Every young man who came from the remote area and possesses a minimum amount of money, could enter a prestigious university, if he had the ability and knowledge. Also, medical care was available to a wide range of people.
Both education and medicine were really free.
2. Social guarantees
The state provided social guaranteestheir citizens. So, everyone could get a job to provide for themselves and their family. Strict censorship of the media made it possible to control the flow of information, so it was generally positive. The military might of the USSR made it possible to keep opponents of our state in check and not wait for an attack from outside.
By and large Brezhnev's stagnation became the most quiet period in the history of the USSR.
Among the negative features are:
For the first time the Brezhnev period was called a "stagnation"young and promising general secretary M. Gorbachev, addressing listeners in 1986. Many then were in agreement with the opinion of the Secretary General. The country was waiting for change, people hoped that after the era of the "dying old men" (Brezhnev, Andropov and Chernenko) a new life would come.
Unfortunately, these hopes were not justified:The country was waiting for a period of perestroika (which the shrewd philosopher Zinoviev called "katosroyoka"), the disintegration of the USSR, social upheavals and a difficult era of general collapse in the 1990s.
Today historians very differently assessthis stage of development of our country. Scientists of the liberal camp say that the USSR began to collapse precisely at this time, and Gorbachev only completed the process of irreversible disintegration of the country.
In general, these historians, the former Soviet Union itself, do not particularly favor, believing that its destruction only benefited all of humanity.
Other scientists hold the oppositeposition. In particular, they believe that stagnation - a period in the development of the country is not easy, but still positive. In fact, it was an unsuccessful attempt to create "socialism with a human face," without the repressive system of Stalin.
Therefore, today some of our fellow citizensthe older generation stagnation period in the USSR is rated positively. They say that at that time they felt the support of the state, they knew that they could not just be fired from their jobs, they could count on getting quality and free medical care and good and free education as well.