Russian Practice in Outsourcing

On the modern Russian market there aredifferent situations. Often companies transfer non-core functions to outsourcers almost completely. Sometimes, the need to use a service like it outsourcing.

There are a number of circumstances where developmentown department can be a pretty good solution for the company. For example, when your own processes are well built, and managers have sufficiently high qualifications. Then you just need to raise the level of your own specialists. However, in such cases there are additional expenses for the development of this department. In fact, it becomes another company within the core business. Not everyone will be ready to put up with this situation.

In most cases, now, executives prefer to create combinations - they carry out some projects on their own, and for certain functions and features they conclude contract of outsourcing. For example, modern banks use workown departments, when it comes to providing the latest technological solutions to customers, for example, mobile and remote services. But in some areas without outsiders can not do even such companies. Thus, it is not necessary to hire and train employees separately to solve a particular problem or problem. It is enough to take advantage of the experience and competence of IT companies, which are usually quite high.

One of the most common models on theour market is a fixed cost. With such a model, even before the work starts, their volume is determined strictly, as well as the final price. The technical and organizational risks associated with this are completely transferred to contractors. This model is bad in that it does not take into account the problems that can arise for objective reasons, not dependent on anyone.

Distributed in the same way as the actual payment modellabor costs. There is no fixed cost here. Payment is carried out depending on how much work the person actually performed. The rates of the artist's specialists and the time spent on the project become the main parameters in this case. So there is supposed to be a certain flexibility of action. This flexibility can be followed by both sides. Work can be re-planned at any time, if the unforeseen circumstances arise. This approach has only the only drawback - the performers lack the motivation to complete the projects in a short time.