Some critics and colleagues of the great Pushkinbelieved that he had no failures in creativity, except one. This failure, in their opinion, was the novel "Dubrovsky". The famous Anna Akhmatova noted that the author wanted to save himself from financial problems for a long time, as the work was obviously intended for success with the public - the notes of the tabloid novel were too slippery. We, of course, have no right to subject such sharp criticism to the work of the genius Pushkin. But here to understand the peculiarities of the behavior of some of its heroes is worth.
According to the researchers of AlexanderSergeevich Pushkin, the novel "Dubrovsky" was conceived back in 1832. There is information that for the sake of this story the author suspended the implementation of other, no less grandiose literary plans. Probably, he himself was interested in the cause of the quarrel between Dubrovsky and Troyekurov, so the work went very quickly. Perhaps Pushkin was so impressed by the history of the real prototype of Dubrovsky that the writing was moving at an accelerated pace. The work is based on the actual events that took place in Belarus. All details were told to Pushkin by his longtime friend Nashchokin in Moscow. And since the author could not write about the real character, who carried the consonant surname Ostrovsky, the work described a quarrel between Dubrovsky and Troyekurov.
To better understand what kind of people are goingspeech in the work, you need a detailed description of Troyekurov and Dubrovsky. To begin better with a negative, in the author's opinion, a hero. So, Troekurov, who is he really? Many critics in describing the character of Troyekurov give a capacious definition of "tyranny." It is this word that most clearly characterizes the style of the hero's behavior. Unbridled character, insane, often dangerous tricks, impudence and self-confidence - here is a brief enumeration of the key qualities of his character. There is information that Troyekurov had a double in real life. It is possible that Pushkin copied this character from his cousin, also a landowner, and also a very uneasy character. To understand what the reason for the quarrel between Dubrovsky and Troyekurov, you need to pay attention to another hero of the work.
It would seem that the old comrades who have similarpast, should have and similar characters. But no, something strikingly different from each other Dubrovsky-father and Troyekurov. The author himself writes many pages, passing similar features and how fates were formed. And the promotion of the career ladder is mentioned here, and the fact that both married, following the call of the heart, and that they did not enjoy a long marriage for love, had a child. Such people are characterized by perseverance and quick temper, they are fully in our heroes. But, despite the close neighborhood, these people are very peculiar, and as a result there is a quarrel between Dubrovsky and Troekurov. Their property position is shared by an abyss. Poverty Dubrovsky - proud, it is not inherent in envy, so he has more to himself. This hero appears before the readers in a noble light. Here is an approximate description of Troyekurov and Dubrovsky, Pushkin's characters.
Pushkin in this work gives us to understand thatfriendship between such different people is possible up to a certain point. It becomes clear that the neighbors do not equally value it. The episode of the quarrel between Dubrovsky and Troyekurov is very tragic, and the consequences are even worse. One day, when Troyekurov had another appointment, he led the guests to his kennel. It so happened that his friend Dubrovsky made a remark to him, as a result of which a quarrel erupted, which for ever erased the long-standing friendship. A very sad fact is opened to the readers here by the author: Troekurov is arrogant, arrogant and does not put an old comrade in pennancy. For Troekurov, offending a friend was not difficult. After all, he recognizes only the language of money, not taking into account the feelings of other people.
All the same, Pushkin gave Troyekurov the opportunitycorrect the situation and ask for forgiveness. Yes, the erratic landlord comes home to his old friend and wants to apologize. But by that time Dubrovsky was already seriously ill. His son blames Troyekurov for everything and does not let him get close to the patient, but he scares the scandal. The reason for the quarrel between Dubrovsky and Troyekurov is very ridiculous, but it affects them in different ways. For one, this is just an unpleasant moment, and for another, a spiritual drama leading to a serious illness and death. One can also understand the feelings of Dubrovsky, the younger: he sincerely feels sorry for his father, who simply turned out to be a devotee. But he does not yet know what Troekurov conceived. Soon the news of the lawsuit will burst like a bolt from the blue. Yes, it is better to be unclean in the hands of someone whose might is heavier, because bribe takers also need to put something in their pocket, it's about colossal bribes. Handing them to the right and left, Troekurov ravages a very recently close friend and revels in victory. In the meantime Dubrovsky-senior is lying, finally finished with grief and illnesses, and soon dies.
Death and ruin - it's not all seriousconsequences, and yet the cause of the quarrel between Dubrovsky and Troekurov is so banal. This should also include the broken happiness of the daughter of Troyekurov Marousi. Very sorry for the young girl, at the will of her father, marrying an elderly landowner. She really loved Dubrovsky, the younger. That's because of the fatherly cruelty that goes hand in hand with greed, and children suffer. Researchers creativity Pushkin argue that in the continuation of this work still provided a happy ending. Dubrovsky, Jr., forced to take the brigandage, will leave for hiding abroad. But in a few years he will return and reunite with his beloved. Unfortunately, the novel is not finished, and there were several variants of the development of events. And we will never know which one is genuine. Only the reason for the quarrel between Dubrovsky and Troyekurov remains clear.
