Each teacher has his own "handwriting."And it is useless to try to retrain a teacher, since he can really work comfortably only in his own way. That, of course, does not negate the need to observe pedagogical ethics and take responsibility for work. So, what are the styles of pedagogical activity?
There are many classifications.Western and domestic, old and new. In fact, when your teacher wants to learn about the styles of pedagogical activity, he usually wants you to talk about the standard classification. It distinguishes three types of teacher's work: democratic, liberal and authoritarian. In fact, there are only two full-fledged species in this classification: the first and the third.
Loafer at school
After all, what is liberal?This, in fact, the teacher's disdain for his duties, when he allows students to create everything they want. And this happens systematically. Such an educator does not interfere in the educational process. That is, he can and talk, and ask, and check notebooks, but he has no discipline, he is not listened to - and he, in fact, does not care.
Now let's describe the two remaining types.If the individual style of pedagogical activity is democratic, it means that the teacher listens to the statements of the students on the rights of an advisory opinion. That is, students know that they have the right to express dissatisfaction or criticism, and for this right no one will suffer a little. Also, such a teacher attracts attention not with forceful methods: shouting, pressure, punishment, but with conviction. But the main way to teach such a teacher is to awaken the desire in children to learn. It is for such teachers that the "tails" of children go, and not only in junior school.
Power is unlimited
Styles of pedagogical activity (classical)include the so-called authoritarian method. A teacher of this type prefers to be the only source of real power. Influence and take it "weakly" is very difficult, his "Moscow" does not believe the tears of schoolchildren, he is firm, sets out the material very clearly. The strict requirements of the teacher, however, do not change, so it's comfortable with it. Sometimes there are only problems with older teachers of this type. Their ability to flexibly look at the situation with age is reduced, and they "spoil" a lot of medals. Or they squeeze a possible medalist to an excellent assessment with additional exercises, open pressure and long conversations. Students of authoritarian teachers often win on subject Olympiads.
Styles of pedagogical activity of the teacher,of course, affect its results. It is clear that the liberal type of teachers do not have any special achievements at all, their very stay at school is temporary until they find "something better" (and they will not spoil the new employer's blood). Pedagogues of the authoritarian type achieve the highest results, and not a few students, they raise the level of the entire class. But democratic achievements are more modest. Their students also win, but less often. There is, however, one interesting feature - wards of the democratic are successfully engaged, even when the teacher is sick or resigned. But the academic grade of an authoritarian teacher without it sharply and noticeably decreases. Now you know what are the styles of pedagogical activity, their pros and cons.
