Any state strives to create such aa society in which people would feel comfortable. At least because the power is kept at the expense of will and level of contentment of citizens. To this end, the state must protect its citizens, set one of its main tasks to ensure human rights, monitor justice in society.
Another famous scientist Maslow schematically depictedbasic human needs in the form of a pyramid, where the foundation was the original, necessary, and then only those that are possible in a more civilized society, taking into account the fact that the main satisfied. Of course, this pyramid did not disclose how human rights are related to its needs, but it prompted important reflections, including in this field. For example, starting from this pyramid, it is concluded that it is impossible to fully satisfy the "top" need (say, aesthetic) if the lower (for example, the need for food) is not satisfied. The basis of such a scheme has always been the biological needs necessary for human life.
Several goals of creation and existenceStates are directed to meet the needs of people. Thus, it protects individual rights and freedoms of the individual, provides him with ways to participate not only in his life, but also in politics and so on. Otherwise, the state does not need society at all, does not represent for it any useful element and practical benefit, on the contrary, it is a burden (taxation). The state is obliged not only to monitor the needs and human rights, but also to promote their implementation, to create the appropriate institutions in the society. Executive and judicial bodies are obliged to monitor the observance of rights. The legislature should clearly know how human rights are related to its needs.
Of course, all socio-legal phenomenaor otherwise related. And in this case, it is necessary to allocate clear criteria for how human rights are related to its needs. Then we will be able to provide the most complete access to the possibilities of their satisfaction. It is concluded that rights and needs are in direct relationship with each other, but the right is always derived from the need. Suppose that if a person wants to realize himself, and this is his need, then he needs the right to training, to work, to engage in activities that he likes, if it does not violate the law.
Most rights related to needs,presumed, that is, fixed at the legislative level in the form of a basic, indestructible position. So, you can bring the rights to life, to free religion and political views, which are also aimed at meeting basic human needs. Let's give a more graphic comparison: the law is connected with public relations in the same way as human rights are related to its needs. That is, relations first arise, then there is a need to regulate them, then the process of lawmaking begins, and only the end of this long chain is the law. The situation with rights is the same - there is no need, there is no need to create and empower people with this right.
The fact is that human needs are played forhis most important role in life. Moreover, his whole process of life activity consists in the emergence of the need and satisfaction of it. Dissatisfaction arouses discontent, and this can lead to more dangerous and negative phenomena. It is necessary to separate needs that are legitimate and have a right to exist, as well as those that are completely incorrect and contrary to the law. The former need to be regulated by ensuring people have the right to implement them. There already further each citizen will decide specifically whether he needs such a need and whether he wants to satisfy her. But the second is required to be regulated by law by imposing a ban under the risk of liability. It is inadmissible that the satisfaction of the needs of one person violates or infringes upon the rights of another.
Knowing how human rights are linked to itsneeds, it is possible to draw an essential conclusion - such a link is necessary, and it can not be violated. Imagine if your rights depended only on the will of the legislator, and not on actual needs. In this case, instead of the right to education, you would be entitled to participate in political life, instead of freedom of speech - the right to work or engage in entrepreneurial activities. Such a state, rather, is harmful to society. Moreover, for a long time people have united in groups in order to satisfy their needs, then these groups grew, because it is much easier to do this collectively than to one, and according to many views, that is how the first states appeared. Moreover, human needs are the engine of scientific progress, the main motivation of many scientists.
