The most important day for each student isthe day of defense of the thesis. In addition to the final work, defensive speech and presentation, the student will need a review, which can be prepared by his supervisor, the director of the enterprise where the student was practicing, or even the student himself. This material describes the basic requirements for writing reviews, as well as examples of writing reviews for the thesis.
Review of the thesis (coursework or anyanother qualifying work) is a mandatory official document in which the reviewer leaves a review of what has been read. This document is necessary in order to allow the student to be protected. It includes many aspects. A worthy example of a review of the thesis work is the one in which, in addition to the final evaluation, there is a summary of the work and its analysis. Immediately the reviewer examines all the shortcomings, mistakes and remarks, describing them in the most detailed and objective manner. It is important to understand that a lot depends on the review. Often it is this document that is decisive at the time of the student's assessment. A good review makes a good impression on the admissions committee, which ultimately can play into the hands of those who worked on the thesis project.
Naturally, to check and evaluate the projecta student should not be a man from the street, but a professional in the topic to which the thesis is devoted. The reviewer is a graduate who can objectively and impartially evaluate the student's work. Ideally, this should be done by the most independent person from outside, whose decision can not be affected by personal perception and relationship with the author of the work. Usually, the director of an enterprise or organization is engaged in this, where the student passed the practice. In this case, the review is made on a special document of the organization. The reviewer should fully own the topic, understand all aspects of the work, correctly describe all the pros and cons. Among other things, the document itself must be properly drawn up. There must be confirmation in the form of a seal and the signature of the head (without this the review will be void). Very often the directors of enterprises and teachers ask the student to write and arrange the document independently, and the teacher has only to put a seal and a signature. If such a practice is available, then each student should be prepared to write a review independently. To do this, you need to get acquainted with good examples of writing a review and detailed instructions for its design.
How to write a review?With an example of finished work, of course, and on established, generally accepted points. Special problems with the main part of the review should not arise. A student is better than anyone, he knows all the advantages and disadvantages of his thesis work and can most competently describe them.
The following important job requirements should be taken into account, which are checked and described in the review:
For convenience of perception, the review can be divided into three main elements:
It is better to avoid common phrases and different cliches. The review should be more specific and less water.
Here everything is as simple as possible.On the Internet, there are many examples of reviews of works of artistic nature and other similar work with a specific design, but when it comes to a diploma, everything should be as ascetic as possible.
In the upper part the word "Review" is written, then the topic of the work, the position and the full name. author.
For example, "Review of the article" The use of modern IT-technologies in teaching the French language "candidate of pedagogical sciences, assistant professor of the Department of Foreign Languages of the Moscow State University Olga Petrovna's Song."
Любой научный труд базируется на этих двух aspects, and they are the most important for the student's work. Relevance can be the use of new techniques, the development of a unique set of measures to eliminate existing problems in the field of activity, which is considered in the thesis, or a fresh look at the usual things. One way or another, this moment should be described in the work itself and reflected in the review of it. If you are personally engaged in a review, then in order to simplify your task, you can find this item in your final project and, paraphrasing it, make it a review. Concerning the relevance and novelty, it is enough to write 2-3 sentences.
Examples of reviews of benefits and different types of workdiffer considerably. A brief analysis is another important point in which the main idea of the whole project will be deduced. What was the essence of the work, what was its purpose and what results the author planned to achieve. Immediately it is necessary to fit information about whether the goal set by the author was achieved, what ideas were implemented during the research.
For example, the author has carried out serious work.on the study of the possibilities of using modern IT-technologies in teaching French. New learning tools have been proposed to help develop reading, speaking, listening and writing skills. The goal - to create a set of exercises using modern technology has been achieved.
Существует масса примеров рецензий на программы research and diploma work from teachers and directors of various enterprises, where this item is described quite dryly, since the reviewer was not particularly enthusiastic about the project. If the student has to write his own review, he gets an opportunity to praise himself properly, describing the positive aspects of his research and its advantages in all its glory. The main thing is not to overdo it, otherwise you will only achieve that the commission will fill you with questions on protection and create many problems.
And here difficulties can begin.In fact, who wants to slander himself and reflect any shortcomings of his own project? To do this yet have to. Objectively describe the problems and shortcomings are unlikely to succeed. It is better to rely on the flaws that have been identified by your supervisor. Consult with the supervisor or supervisor of the practice, who, if not they, are best of all aware of what shortcomings your qualifying work has?
The main thing is to feel the edge and do not write to yourself too much. Being too critical of yourself can lead to a dead end and make it impossible to speak at all on defense.
If you look at examples of writing reviewson the thesis, it is unlikely to find there this item. Usually, the practical value of a research is indicated only if it is a question of a candidate’s work or dissertation. Nevertheless, if there is such a point in your project, then this should definitely be mentioned. Of course, it is not enough to indicate the fact of practical value, the reviewer is obliged to express his position and say what exactly the work done can be useful.
Evaluation of work should be of a general and particular nature. This means that the reviewer should fully appreciate all the work and each individual chapter.
The overall assessment includes such moments ascorrect design and proportionality of each chapter and paragraph, the consistency of the material, the presence of well-constructed conclusions for each part. The presence of professional terms, applications, images, tables, histograms and other visual accents.
The first chapter assesses how the authorprovides information, compliance with the scientific style of presentation, the overall level of literacy. The ability of the author to clearly articulate the idea and convey your opinion on the topic under study.
The second chapter evaluates how deepstudied the topic, how qualitative analysis was conducted by the author, what conclusions were made in the end. All student activity in collecting and processing information from sources, statistics, interpretation of the data obtained is described in this paragraph.
The third chapter describes the possibilitypractical application of the recommendations that the student gives in his work. Ideas that were implemented during the pre-diploma practice. Specific proposals and ready-made options for their use in real life and work. This part can be inscribed in the second chapter, if that is practical.
If you look at the examples of reviews of coursework and thesis, it becomes clear that they are visually drawn up just like the diploma or coursework itself. Requirements:
How to write a review? The easiest way to do this is based on a specific job. Below will be offered one sample to which you can navigate.
Review
For the final qualifying work on the topic "The use of IT-technologies in teaching French" student Ptitsina Elizaveta Sergeyevna.
Актуальность представленной работы due to a number of factors. Among them is the need to meet the level of education with the new requirements that are placed on graduates, and the ubiquity of IT-technologies that affect various spheres of life.
Ptitsina E.V.processed a large array of information, including research papers and textbooks. Methodological and theoretical foundations are at a high level. The information presented in the thesis work, has a clear sequence, structured and presented in accordance with the scientific style. The volume of the thesis is 97 pages, among which 4 applications, 7 figures, 2 tables and 5 diagrams.
In the first chapter, the author spent a deep and detailedanalysis of theoretical information on the selected topic. The concept of IT-technologies, the main aspects and problems of teaching French are revealed in detail. The objectives and methods of analysis of the effectiveness of the use of IT-technologies in education are determined.
The second chapter identifies features of training insecondary school. The author presents the characteristics of the school and proposed an experiment to identify the effectiveness of the proposed training program. Describes the tools that were used in the course of the practice. Prepared a set of lessons using modern IT-technologies. The author analyzed the work done and provided specific data on improving the effectiveness of training using IT-technologies.
The student has shown the ability to properly expressyour thoughts. The formulated conclusions have a strong justification and can be used in practice. Serious shortcomings in the work was not found. It is made in accordance with the requirements of GOST. Recommended rating is excellent.
This example of a job review (coursework or degree) is a bit simplified, but can be used together with more detailed reviews.
Before writing, you must once again readwith graduation work. Check it for compliance. See a few examples of theses reviews. Following the test, you need to check the uniqueness of the project again and re-read the ready review several times.
