Acmeism in literature - the current that arosein the very beginning of the 20th century and was widely spread among all poets who created their masterpieces during this period of time. Mostly he hooked up Russian literature, and also became a kind of reciprocal move towards symbolism. This direction is characterized by clarity, utmost clarity and down-to-earthness, but at the same time in poems of Acmeist poets there is no place for everyday problems.
Acmeism in literature has always been differentsensuality, a tendency to analyze human feelings and experiences. The poets who wrote their works in this style were quite specific, did not use metaphors and hyperbole. As modern writers believe, such characteristics appeared, as it were, in contrast to the pre-existing symbolism, which, in turn, was famous for the vagueness of the images, a complete lack of specificity and accuracy. At the same time, the acmeists attached importance only to higher human needs, that is, they described the spiritual world. Political or social themes, aggressiveness and the like were alien to them. That's why their poems are so easily perceived, because they write about complex things very simply.
As such, a philosophy that would definetime Acmeism in Russian literature was not. Such a point of support was formed only in the process of existence and prosperity of the style, when the first verses of its representatives began to appear on the light, from which it was possible to determine the whole essence of what was written. Thus, acmeism in literature has distinguished itself by a realistic view not only of the general picture of life, but also of quite "unearthly" problems that are associated with feelings and emotional experiences. The key role in any work, according to the authors, was to play the word. It was with his help that with utmost precision all the thoughts and events that were described should have been expressed.
Most often, the symbolism that wasthe precursor of acmeism, is compared with music. He is as mysterious, polysemantic, can be interpreted in all ways. It is thanks to such artistic techniques that this style became a concept in the then art. In turn, acmeism as a flow in literature has become a very significant opposite of its predecessor. Poets-representatives of this direction themselves compare their creativity more with architecture or with sculpture, rather than with music. Their poems are incredibly beautiful, but at the same time accurate, foldable and extremely understandable for any audience. Each word conveys directly the meaning that was originally laid in it, without any exaggeration or comparison. That is why Acmeist verses are so easy to teach to the memory of all schoolchildren, and so just understand their essence.
A distinctive feature of all representatives of thisliterary trend was not just cohesion, but even friendship. They worked in the same harness, and at the very beginning of their creative path they loudly announced themselves, having founded the so-called "Poets' Workshop" in Leningrad. They did not have a specific literary platform, standards on which it was necessary to write poetry, or other production details. It can be said that each of the poets knew what his work should be, and he knew how to give each word so that it was extremely understandable to others. And among such geniuses of clarity, one can distinguish famous names: Anna Akhmatova, her husband Nikolai Gumilev, Osip Mandelstam, Sergei Gorodetsky, Vladimir Narbut, Mikhail Kuzmin and others. The poems of each of the authors differ from each other both in structure and in character and mood. However, each work will be understandable, and the person will not have unnecessary questions after reading it.
When acmeism appeared in the literature, the firstsummaries about him people read in the magazine Hyperborei, which was released under the editorship of the poets we know. By the way, in connection with this, often the Acmeists were also called Hyperboreans, who fought for the novelty and beauty of Russian art. Then came a series of articles written by virtually every member of the "Poet's Workshop", which revealed the essence of this literary trend, washed away existence and much more. But, despite the zeal for work and even for the friendship of all the poets who became the founders of the new trend in art, Acmeism in Russian literature began to fade. By 1922, the "Poets' Workshop" had already ceased to exist, attempts to resume it were in vain. As the then literary critics believed, the reason for the failure was that the theory of acmeists did not coincide with practical intentions, and they did not succeed in breaking off completely from symbolism.
