If you believe the dictionaries, then the masterpiece isan exceptional work of art or craftsmanship, which over time does not lose its artistic value and meaning. The masterpiece is unique and unique in its kind.
In the Middle Ages, the masterpieces were the products made by apprentices, who dreamed of being called masters.
When determining a masterpiece, it is very difficult to get away from the subjective attitude to the subject of art.
Everyone knows the expression "there is no dispute about tastes"gives, thus, the space of perception of each person. But when we say the word "masterpiece", we put a stamp of the highest quality, claiming unequivocal admiration. Does this mean that a masterpiece is something that stands outside the usual criteria of the artistic value of a work of art?
Absolutely accurate and indisputable definition of a masterpiece is not a single author. How can you understand that this work relates to unique, eternal and unsurpassed?
Obviously, a masterpiece is a workart, showing signs of freshness and novelty with a simple (or simple enough) and understandable for most incarnations combined with a deep taste. As a rule, a masterpiece is determined by a large number of people who will call this work without special proofs and justifications.
The main thing is that the masterpiece always stands the test of time, producing the same impression on admirers as many centuries ago.
In any country there are talented authors whoas if by default create masterpieces. To such in Russia it is possible to carry, for example, the composer Mikael Tariverdiev. But his music, at the same time, is known and appreciated only in the CIS countries, and works that were performed abroad are not masterpieces there.
Значит ли это, что, признавая какое-либо a masterpiece, need a correction for the mentality, cultural traditions and heritage of the country in which it was created? Can there be a small township, a small masterpiece? This is a very controversial and still insoluble issue. After all, Russian folk tales are also a masterpiece of folk art, but, nevertheless, they are precisely for the Russian-speaking population of the Earth.
A work claiming the title of a masterpiece, as a rule, is a harmonious combination of mathematical logic that does not allow breaking "symmetry", and emotions that the author puts into it.
Equally important is the experience and personal achievements of the creator.The famous Velázquez, who created masterpieces of painting, spoke of his works: "I wrote the picture for two hours and ... the entire preceding life." And Leonardo da Vinci, for example, was very unhappy with his unique "Mona Lisa", considering it unfinished.
In the perception of the work, as a rule, a hugethe emotional background plays a role. "I cried before these works, not with sadness, but with overwhelming delight," - said the connoisseur about the works of Italian masters of painting, placed in the Louvre. Obviously, a masterpiece is a master's work that can evoke such emotions.
